From: Joachim Breitner
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 08:52:18 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Improve Demo further
X-Git-Tag: 0_2~7
X-Git-Url: https://git.nomeata.de/?p=ghc-heap-view.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=c9d328c97a9a1692c6429432f3fbd08a64072e98;hp=9d531191c8ccbb06f1ee7f10856bb9d25a8967c3
Improve Demo further
---
diff --git a/Demo.hs b/Demo.hs
index ed66bcb..ad5d4f7 100644
--- a/Demo.hs
+++ b/Demo.hs
@@ -18,43 +18,56 @@ main = do
performGC
putStrLn "ghc-heap-view-demo"
putStrLn ""
- putStrLn "Here are a few different lists."
- putStrLn $ "The first one, l, found at " ++ show (asBox l) ++ " (where the /2 is the pointer tag information) is a module-level constant, and fully evaluated:"
- getClosureData l >>= print
- putStrLn $ "The second one, l2, found at " ++ show (asBox l2) ++ " is locally defined as l2 = 4:l. See how the cons-cell references l!"
- getClosureData l2 >>= print
- putStrLn $ "And here is the list args (" ++ show (asBox args) ++ ") that is static, but not known at compiletime, as it depends on the command line arguments:"
- getClosureData args >>= print
- putStrLn $ "And now we have, at " ++ show (asBox x) ++ ", the concatenation of them, but unevaluated. The thunk keeps a reference to l2 and args, but not l, as that is at a static address, unless you are running this in GHCi:"
- getClosureData x >>= print
+ putStrLn "Here are a four different lists, where the first three are already evaluated."
+ putStrLn "The first one, l, was defined as a top level constant as "
+ putStrLn "> l = [1,2,3]"
+ putStrLn $ "and is now found at " ++ show (asBox l) ++ " (where the /2 is the pointer tag information) and fully evaluated:"
+ getClosureData l >>= printInd
+ putStrLn $ "The second one, l2, is locally defined"
+ putStrLn "> let l2 = 4:l"
+ putStrLn $ "and now found at " ++ show (asBox l2) ++ ". See how the cons-cell references l!"
+ getClosureData l2 >>= printInd
+ putStrLn "And the binding"
+ putStrLn "> args <- map length `fmap` getArgs"
+ putStrLn $ "gives us at " ++ show (asBox args) ++ " a static, but at compile time unknown list:"
+ getClosureData args >>= printInd
+ getClosureData [] >>= printInd
+ putStrLn $ "And now we have, at " ++ show (asBox x) ++ ", the concatenation of them, but unevaluated:"
+ putStrLn "> let x = l ++ l2 ++ args"
+ putStrLn "The thunk keeps a reference to l2 and args, but not l, as that is at a static address, unless you are running this in GHCi:"
+ getClosureData x >>= printInd
putStrLn ""
- putStrLn "Now to some more closure types:"
+ putStrLn "Now to some more closure types. m and m' locally bound of type the unboxed type Int#, with values 42 resp. 23."
+ putStrLn "> let f = \\x n -> take (I# m + I# x) n ++ args"
+ putStrLn " t = f m' l2"
let !(I# m) = length args + 42
let !(I# m') = length args + 23
let f = \x n -> take (I# m + I# x) n ++ args
t = f m' l2
- putStrLn $ "The following value f (" ++ show (asBox f) ++ ") is a locally defined function that has args as a free variable, as well as an unboxed integer (42):"
- getClosureData f >>= print
- putStrLn "And the following is a thunk that applies f (also references here) to an unboxed value (23) and l2:"
- getClosureData t >>= print
+ putStrLn $ "So here is (" ++ show (asBox f) ++ "), referncing its free variables args and 42:"
+ getClosureData f >>= printInd
+ putStrLn "And t is a thunk that applies f (also referenced here) to an unboxed value (23) and l2:"
+ getClosureData t >>= printInd
putStrLn ""
- putStrLn "Here is the standard example for self reference:"
+ putStrLn "Lastly, here is the standard example for self reference:"
putStrLn "> let x = id (:) () x"
let x = id (:) () x
putStrLn $ "This is what x (" ++ show (asBox x) ++ ") looks like, at least without -O:"
- getClosureData x >>= print
+ getClosureData x >>= printInd
x `seq` return ()
putStrLn $ "So it is unevaluated. Let us evaluate it using seq. Now we have, still at " ++ show (asBox x) ++ ":"
- getClosureData x >>= print
+ getClosureData x >>= printInd
IndClosure {indirectee = target} <- getClosureData x
putStrLn $ "The thunk was replaced by an indirection. If we look at the target, " ++ show target ++ ", we see that it is a newly created cons-cell referencing the original location of x:"
- getBoxedClosureData target >>= print
+ getBoxedClosureData target >>= printInd
performGC
putStrLn $ "After running the garbage collector (performGC), we find that the address of x is now " ++ show (asBox x) ++ " and that the self-reference is without indirections:"
- getClosureData x >>= print
+ getClosureData x >>= printInd
+printInd :: Show a => a -> IO ()
+printInd x = putStrLn $ " " ++ show x
recurse :: Int -> Box -> IO ()
recurse m = go 0